![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
https://bit.ly/3Br8uaV https://bit.ly/34Jxuye https://bit.ly/3HZrdg6 https://bit.ly/3oUTe0K https://bit.ly/3HXQEPh https://bit.ly/3BsU3CW https://bit.ly/3Bvk58A https://bit.ly/3sN6HsP https://bit.ly/3JBF10A
But this site is aimed at individuals who actively want a so-called ‘unequal’ relationship (in a sense, there is nothing unequal about it, in that it is totally consensual and the wholehearted wish of the alleged underdog). And for those individuals, giving up control can be both healthy and delightful.
Yes, there are risks. Yes, you have to be very careful to choose a man who is good, kind, and nice, not a self-serving narcissist abuser. Yes, you and your spouse are bound to make mistakes, some of which may be harmful to you and/or to your relationship. But for those drawn to the idea of a Taken In Hand relationship, there is not always another option. And I'd be willing to bet that if you took a bunch of Taken In Hand folk and gave them therapy to help them learn how to have the ‘equal’ relationship alleged to be the best kind of relationship, if they actually managed to cut out the power/control/discipline dynamics and each do 50% of the household chores and so on, most of them would be less happy than they are in their Taken In Hand relationship.
by Sarah Cavendish on 2006 Sep 10 - 19:32 | reply to this comment In his/her initial post MD se In his/her initial post MD seems to explain the benefits of a Taken in Hand relationship in terms of resolution of conflict and the demonstration of trust and investment in the relationship the complimentary roles produce.
